Home > Blogs > Is IVF Safe for Me and My Baby?

Is IVF Safe for Me and My Baby?

Medically reviewed by Dr. Aarti Deenadayal Tolani, Fertility Specialist & IVF Expert, Mamata Fertility Hospital, Hyderabad

IVF is one of the most extensively studied medical procedures in existence. For most patients, it is safe but it is not risk-free, and honest patients deserve honest answers. The main maternal risks are ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), which modern protocols have significantly reduced, and the complications of multiple pregnancy, which single embryo transfer eliminates.

For babies, the evidence across 40 years and millions of children is broadly reassuring: long-term health outcomes are similar to naturally conceived children, though there are small but real increases in birth defect and preterm birth rates that are important to understand. Knowing the actual risks not the inflated fears or the over-optimistic dismissals is what informed consent means.

Is IVF safe?” is one of the first questions most couples in Hyderabad ask when fertility treatment is recommended. It is also one of the most important and one that deserves a more careful answer than “yes, it’s very safe” or a list of frightening statistics pulled from early research.

IVF has been performed since 1978. Tens of millions of children have been born through IVF worldwide. The safety of the procedure for mothers and for children  has been studied more rigorously and for longer than almost any other reproductive medical intervention. That body of evidence is genuinely reassuring in most respects, and it is also honest about where risks exist.

This article gives you the full picture: what the risks are, how large they actually are, and what modern techniques have done to reduce them. Understanding what happens at each stage of IVF helps contextualise where each risk arises.

Is IVF Safe for the Mother?

1. Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS)

OHSS is the most clinically significant risk specific to IVF treatment for the mother. It occurs when the ovaries overrespond to stimulation medications, become enlarged, and in severe cases cause fluid to shift into the abdomen and chest cavity.

Severity spectrum:

Severity Symptoms Frequency
Mild Bloating, discomfort, mild nausea 20–30% of stimulation cycles
Moderate Significant bloating, nausea, vomiting, weight gain 3–6% of cycles
Severe Marked abdominal distension, difficulty breathing, reduced urination, clotting risk 0.5–2% of cycles
Critical Hospitalisation required, rare complications (thrombosis, renal impairment) <0.1%

Mild OHSS resolves on its own within a week. Moderate OHSS may require close monitoring and symptomatic treatment. Severe OHSS requires hospital management.

Risk factors for OHSS: PCOS, young age (under 35), low body weight, high antral follicle count, high oestrogen response, and a large number of eggs retrieved.

What has dramatically reduced OHSS in modern IVF:

  • GnRH antagonist protocols with agonist trigger (using Lupride as the trigger instead of hCG)  virtually eliminates the risk of severe OHSS in high-risk patients
  • Freeze-all strategy  no fresh embryo transfer in cycles with high OHSS risk; all embryos are frozen, eliminating the additional hCG of pregnancy that would worsen OHSS
  • Careful stimulation monitoring with dose adjustments based on response
  • Segmentation of the cycle separating stimulation from transfer when risk is identified

The rate of severe OHSS at experienced centres using modern protocols is now below 1%. Mild symptoms are expected and manageable; severe OHSS requiring hospitalisation is rare.

2. Egg Retrieval Procedure Risks

Egg retrieval is a transvaginal ultrasound-guided procedure performed under sedation or light anaesthesia. A fine needle passes through the vaginal wall into each follicle to aspirate the follicular fluid and egg. It takes 20–30 minutes and patients go home the same day.

Procedural risks:

  • Bleeding: Minor bleeding from the vaginal wall or ovary is common and self-limiting. Significant internal bleeding requiring intervention is rare (approximately 1 in 1,000 procedures).
  • Infection: Pelvic infection after egg retrieval is very rare (<1%). Women with prior ovarian endometriomas or anatomical challenges may have a slightly higher risk; prophylactic antibiotics are used.
  • Injury to adjacent structures: The bladder, bowel, or blood vessels are extremely rarely injured during retrieval. This risk is minimised by ultrasound guidance and experienced operators.
  • Anaesthetic risks: Standard risks of sedation/anaesthesia apply. Most IVF retrievals use light intravenous sedation, not general anaesthesia, which reduces anaesthetic risk substantially.

Overall, egg retrieval has an excellent safety record across millions of procedures. The risks exist but are small in absolute terms.

For reference on what bleeding after IVF looks like and when to be concerned, see our article on heavy bleeding after IVF.

3. Multiple Pregnancy: Historically the Biggest Safety Risk

Before the era of single embryo transfer (SET), the practice of transferring two or three embryos simultaneously led to high rates of twin and triplet pregnancies after IVF. Multiple pregnancies carry substantially higher risks for both mother and babies:

Maternal risks in multiple pregnancy:

  • Preeclampsia (3–4× higher risk with twins)
  • Gestational diabetes
  • Anaemia
  • Preterm labour
  • Emergency Caesarean section
  • Postpartum haemorrhage

Baby risks in multiple pregnancy:

  • Preterm birth (>50% of twins deliver before 37 weeks)
  • Low birth weight
  • Neonatal intensive care admission
  • Long-term developmental risks associated with extreme prematurity

The modern solution: single embryo transfer (SET). Transferring one embryo at a time the current standard at responsible IVF centres eliminates almost all IVF-specific multiple pregnancy risk. A singleton IVF pregnancy carries a maternal risk profile comparable to a natural singleton pregnancy. The cumulative live birth rate over multiple sequential single transfers is equivalent to transferring multiple embryos at once, with dramatically less risk.

At Mamata Fertility, Hyderabad, single embryo transfer is the default recommendation whenever the embryo quality and clinical picture supports it.

4. Ectopic Pregnancy

Ectopic pregnancy where the embryo implants outside the uterus, most commonly in the fallopian tube occurs in approximately 1–3% of IVF pregnancies, slightly higher than the natural conception rate (approximately 1–2%).

The elevated risk is partly attributable to the same tubal damage that caused infertility in the first place, rather than IVF itself. Women with a history of tubal disease or previous ectopic pregnancy are at higher risk.

If you have a positive pregnancy test after IVF and experience significant one-sided pelvic pain, seek emergency care immediately ectopic pregnancy is a medical emergency.

5. Emotional and Psychological Health

IVF places significant emotional demands on individuals and couples. Anxiety, depression, relationship strain, grief following failed cycles, and the burden of the two-week wait are all documented consequences of IVF treatment. These are not peripheral concerns they are real health risks that deserve the same clinical attention as OHSS.

Counselling services are an integral part of IVF care at Mamata Fertility, available at any stage of treatment and regardless of outcome. Psychological support during IVF is not a sign of weakness it is evidence-based healthcare.

6. Cancer Risk

The concern that IVF medications might increase cancer risk is covered in depth in our dedicated article on IVF and cancer risk. In summary: current evidence from large, long-term cohort studies does not establish a significant causal link between IVF and ovarian, breast, or endometrial cancer. Women with specific risk factors such as BRCA mutations should discuss this with their doctor individually.

7. Long-Term Reproductive Health

A common concern is whether IVF by stimulating large numbers of follicles depletes the ovarian reserve and accelerates menopause. Current evidence does not support this.

The follicles stimulated in any given IVF cycle are drawn from the pool of follicles that would have undergone atresia (natural cell death) during that menstrual cycle anyway. In a natural cycle, one follicle is selected and the rest die. IVF medications rescue multiple follicles from that fate they do not take additional eggs from the primordial reserve.

Is IVF Safe for the Baby?

This is where the research is the most nuanced and where it is most important to be precise rather than reassuring by default.

1. Birth Defects: A Small but Real Increase

In the general population, approximately 2–3% of babies are born with a major birth defect. In IVF-conceived children, this figure is approximately 3–4%  a small but statistically detectable increase that is important to acknowledge.

What drives this increase?

The evidence strongly suggests that most of this increase is attributable to parental factors  specifically, the underlying causes of infertility  rather than the IVF process itself. Couples who need IVF have higher rates of genetic abnormalities, chromosomal variations, and conditions that themselves carry birth defect risk. When researchers compare IVF-conceived children to children born to naturally conceived subfertile couples (who took longer to conceive but did not use IVF), the gap in birth defect rates substantially narrows.

ICSI-specific considerations: ICSI bypasses the natural sperm selection process. There is a small but discussed concern that ICSI may allow the fertilisation of eggs by sperm carrying genetic material that natural fertilisation would screen out. The data on whether ICSI specifically increases birth defect rates beyond what IVF alone produces is mixed, but the signal is worth acknowledging honestly.

One specific genetic consideration: Y chromosome microdeletions a cause of severe male infertility can be transmitted from father to son through ICSI. A male child born via ICSI from a father with Y chromosome microdeletion will likely also have male infertility as an adult. Genetic counselling before ICSI in cases of severe male infertility or azoospermia addresses this.

How PGT-A affects this: Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT-A) screens embryos for chromosomal abnormalities before transfer. PGT-A reduces the rate of chromosomally-related birth defects significantly it is not routine for all IVF cycles, but is particularly relevant for women over 37 and those with previous failed cycles or miscarriage.

2. Preterm Birth and Low Birth Weight

Singleton IVF pregnancies have higher rates of preterm birth (birth before 37 weeks) and low birth weight compared to singleton natural conceptions. The magnitude of this increase in well-designed studies is modest but real.

Factors involved:

  • Underlying maternal age and medical factors in IVF patients
  • The hormonal environment of IVF early pregnancy
  • Fresh vs frozen transfer differences

Fresh vs frozen transfer: Multiple studies have found that babies born from frozen embryo transfers (FET) have better neonatal outcomes than those from fresh transfers closer to natural conception rates for preterm birth and birth weight. This is one of several reasons why frozen embryo transfer has become the preferred strategy at many experienced centres.

Multiple pregnancies: The preterm birth risk in IVF twins is dramatically higher than in singletons. This is the strongest clinical argument for single embryo transfer.

3. Long-Term Health of IVF-Conceived Children

This is where the evidence is most reassuring. Multiple large, long-term studies including Scandinavian national cohorts now following IVF children into their 20s and 30s have found no significant difference in long-term health outcomes between IVF-conceived and naturally conceived individuals in terms of:

  • Cardiovascular health
  • Neurological development and cognitive function
  • Educational achievement
  • Mental health outcomes
  • Reproductive health (in female IVF-conceived adults)
  • Overall mortality

Children born through IVF are now adults, and the data on their long-term health is broadly reassuring. The earlier concerns about epigenetic effects that the IVF laboratory environment might alter gene expression in ways that affect long-term health have not materialised as significant findings in large population studies.

4. Imprinting Disorders: Rare but Real

A small number of rare genetic conditions caused by epigenetic errors (imprinting disorders) including Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and Angelman syndrome appear to be slightly more common in IVF/ICSI-conceived children than in naturally conceived children.

The absolute risk remains very small. Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, for example, occurs in approximately 1 in 10,000–15,000 births in the general population. Even if the risk were doubled in IVF children (which some studies suggest), the absolute risk remains very low.

This finding is worth knowing about it should not be a reason to avoid IVF, but it should be part of the informed consent conversation.

5. Childhood Cancer Risk

Large registries covering hundreds of thousands of IVF-conceived children in Scandinavia, Australia, and the United Kingdom have found no significant increase in childhood cancer rates compared to naturally conceived children. This is covered in detail in our dedicated article on IVF and cancer risk.

What Modern IVF Techniques Have Done for Safety

The safety profile of IVF in 2026 is substantially better than it was in 2000 largely due to specific technical and clinical advances:

Single embryo transfer (SET): Eliminates multiple pregnancy risk, the historically largest safety concern. Most responsible clinics now transfer one embryo at a time.

Freeze-all / FET strategy: Reduces OHSS risk and appears to improve neonatal outcomes.

GnRH antagonist protocols with agonist trigger: Near-elimination of severe OHSS in high-risk patients (particularly PCOS).

Vitrification (rapid embryo freezing): Dramatically improved frozen embryo survival rates now equivalent to fresh making freeze-all viable without sacrificing success rates.

PGT-A: Reduces chromosomally-related implantation failure, miscarriage, and birth defects.

Time-lapse embryo monitoring: Improved embryo selection without disturbing the culture environment.

Experienced embryology laboratories: Stringent air quality, temperature stability, and culture media have improved embryo health during the culture period.

Each of these advances has made IVF meaningfully safer for both mother and baby compared to the practice of even 15 years ago.


If you are considering IVF and have specific concerns about safety based on your own health history, family history, or something you have read raise them directly with your fertility specialist before starting treatment. A good clinic will take your concerns seriously, explain the risks specific to your situation, and where relevant, offer modified protocols that reduce those risks.

At Mamata Fertility, Hyderabad, our pre-IVF consultation includes a full medical history review, discussion of individual risk factors, and explanation of the specific protocol we are recommending and why. Request a pre-IVF consultation to discuss your specific situation with our team.

Making an Informed Decision

The question “is IVF safe?” has no single yes or no answer it depends on what risk you are comparing it to, what your specific medical situation is, and what value you place on different outcomes.

What the evidence does say is this:

  • For most patients, the risks of IVF are small in absolute terms and well-characterised
  • Modern IVF is significantly safer than IVF of 20 years ago
  • The alternative untreated infertility carries its own medical and psychological costs
  • The most significant risks (OHSS, multiple pregnancy) are largely preventable with modern techniques
  • Long-term health outcomes for IVF-conceived children are broadly reassuring

Whether IVF will be successful for you is a separate and important question from whether it is safe. Understanding both the probability of success and the nature of the risks is what genuine informed consent means.

Key Differences Between Natural Pregnancy and IVF

Aspect Natural Pregnancy IVF
Conception Method Occurs within the body after sexual intercourse Occurs in a lab with egg and sperm joined outside
Fertilisation Takes place inside the fallopian tubes Takes place in a controlled lab environment
Egg Retrieval Natural ovulation process Involves medication and a procedure to retrieve eggs
Embryo Transfer Naturally occurs within the body Embryo is transferred to the uterus via a medical procedure
Prenatal Monitoring Standard prenatal care May involve additional monitoring in early stages
Success Rate Generally high for fertile couples Varies depending on age and health factors
Cost Mostly limited to routine prenatal care costs Higher due to medication and procedural expenses
Emotional Impact Often less stressful Can be emotionally taxing due to the process and uncertainty

Misconceptions about IVF

There are several misconceptions surrounding IVF that can create unnecessary fear or confusion for prospective parents.

One common myth is that IVF is only for young women, but in reality, IVF can assist women of various age groups, although success rates may vary.

Another widespread misconception is that IVF always results in multiple births; while it’s true that IVF can increase the likelihood of twins or triplets, advancements in technology and careful embryo transfer practices have significantly reduced this risk.

Some people think IVF is like magic, but it’s actually science and care working together to provide the best possible outcome for each individual situation.

Furthermore, there’s a belief that IVF guarantees pregnancy, though it is not foolproof and comes with its own set of challenges and considerations. Dispelling these myths is crucial for understanding the actual scope and effectiveness of IVF treatments.

Final Thoughts: Summarising the Safety and Benefits of IVF

In summation, IVF stands as a significant advancement in reproductive medicine, offering hope and solutions for couples facing fertility challenges. The process, while sometimes emotionally and physically demanding, is designed with safety and efficacy in mind.

Modern techniques and personalised care have made IVF safer than ever, reducing risks associated with multiple births and improving outcomes across various age groups.

Key points to remember include the procedural differences and costs involved in IVF compared to natural conception, the importance of dispelling myths surrounding IVF, and understanding that it is a well-regulated practice grounded in science and medical expertise.

Couples considering IVF are encouraged to consult with a specialist who can provide tailored advice and support throughout the journey.

Just like climbing a hill with a guide, IVF with a doctor’s help can be a safe and rewarding journey, ensuring that couples are well-prepared and supported in their quest to achieve a healthy pregnancy and birth.

Consultation with a Fertility Specialist

Just like visiting a trusted teacher for advice on a project, talking to a Fertility Specialist Hyderbad is the best way to know if IVF is right for you.

Consulting with a fertility specialist ensures you receive personalised medical advice tailored to your unique situation, helping you navigate the complexities and options available in fertility treatments.

Don’t hesitate—schedule a consultation today to take the first step towards understanding your fertility health and exploring the possibilities that IVF can offer.

Your journey to parenthood can be both informed and hopeful with the guidance of an experienced professional.

Dr Aarti Deenadayal Tolani

MBBS, MS ( OBGYN), FICOG

Clinical Director, Scientific In- Charge & Fertility Consultant with 15+ years Of Experience

Her Expertise:

Visit Her Profile >

CONSULT FERTILITY SPECIALIST







    LATEST BLOGS